Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
391 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
151
87
71
26
16
Contributors
58
55
51
39
39
Categories
190
94
84
83
59
Platforms
185
69
60
30
27
Products / Services
73
58
50
43
31
MITRE Techniques
18,116
15,638
12,585
8,395
6,225
IDS Classtypes
4
IDS Protocols
4
Detects instances where an AI agent (e.g., Semantic Kernel) launches command-line tools commonly used to perform bulk data destruction or system wiping, such as file deletion commands, volume shadow copy removal, or disk formatting. This rule flags suspicious orchestration by AI agents that may be acting outside of expected parameters.
Detects a potential destructive activity pattern involving the staging of a payload in a non-standard directory (utilizing a directory name with a trailing space) followed by a burst of file deletions on the same device. This behavior is indicative of a secondary destructive payload execution, often associated with disk-wiping malware.
Detects high-volume deletion or recycling of files within OneDrive or SharePoint for a specific user, which may indicate malicious activity such as data destruction, ransomware, or unauthorized data exfiltration staging.
Detects suspicious activity on VMware ESXi hosts involving the termination or unregistration of virtual machines via 'esxcli' or 'vim-cmd', correlated with high volumes of file modification or creation events (.vmdk or .vmx files) within a short window. This pattern often indicates attempts to disrupt virtual machines or inhibit system recovery by adversaries.
Detects rapid, large-scale deletion of Azure storage accounts by a single identity within a short timeframe. This behavior is indicative of destructive activity, such as a malicious actor attempting to disrupt service availability or impact organizational data, rather than typical administrative teardown.
Detects rapid, large-scale deletion of Azure storage accounts by a single identity within a short timeframe. This behavior is indicative of destructive activity, such as a malicious actor attempting to disrupt service availability or impact organizational data, rather than typical administrative teardown.
Detects rapid, large-scale deletion of Azure storage accounts by a single identity within a short timeframe. This behavior is indicative of destructive activity, such as a malicious actor attempting to disrupt service availability or impact organizational data, rather than typical administrative teardown.
Detects a service principal attempting to delete multiple Azure SQL databases in a short timeframe, resulting in failures. This pattern is characteristic of malicious data destruction activity, such as that observed in Storm-3168 (JADEPUFFER) campaigns, but accounts for the possibility of misconfigured infrastructure-as-code pipelines by requiring a high volume of failed requests across distinct resources.
Detects a service principal attempting to delete multiple Azure SQL databases in a short timeframe, resulting in failures. This pattern is characteristic of malicious data destruction activity, such as that observed in Storm-3168 (JADEPUFFER) campaigns, but accounts for the possibility of misconfigured infrastructure-as-code pipelines by requiring a high volume of failed requests across distinct resources.
Detects a service principal attempting to delete multiple Azure SQL databases in a short timeframe, resulting in failures. This pattern is characteristic of malicious data destruction activity, such as that observed in Storm-3168 (JADEPUFFER) campaigns, but accounts for the possibility of misconfigured infrastructure-as-code pipelines by requiring a high volume of failed requests across distinct resources.
Detects a precursor pattern identified as JADEPUFFER, where a failed 'ListKeys' operation (indicating an attempt to discover or access keys for a non-existent storage account) is immediately followed by a burst of destructive delete operations on critical cloud resources (e.g., storage, databases, key vaults) by the same actor.
Detects a precursor pattern identified as JADEPUFFER, where a failed 'ListKeys' operation (indicating an attempt to discover or access keys for a non-existent storage account) is immediately followed by a burst of destructive delete operations on critical cloud resources (e.g., storage, databases, key vaults) by the same actor.
Detects a precursor pattern identified as JADEPUFFER, where a failed 'ListKeys' operation (indicating an attempt to discover or access keys for a non-existent storage account) is immediately followed by a burst of destructive delete operations on critical cloud resources (e.g., storage, databases, key vaults) by the same actor.
Detects a coordinated, rapid deletion of a Key Vault, Function App, and App Service plan within the same resource group and time window by the same caller. This pattern is indicative of targeted destructive activity, such as that seen in the JADEPUFFER campaign, while explicitly excluding scenarios where the entire resource group is deleted, which is typical of routine IaC teardowns.
Detects a coordinated, rapid deletion of a Key Vault, Function App, and App Service plan within the same resource group and time window by the same caller. This pattern is indicative of targeted destructive activity, such as that seen in the JADEPUFFER campaign, while explicitly excluding scenarios where the entire resource group is deleted, which is typical of routine IaC teardowns.
Detects a coordinated, rapid deletion of a Key Vault, Function App, and App Service plan within the same resource group and time window by the same caller. This pattern is indicative of targeted destructive activity, such as that seen in the JADEPUFFER campaign, while explicitly excluding scenarios where the entire resource group is deleted, which is typical of routine IaC teardowns.
Detects a coordinated, rapid deletion of a Key Vault, Function App, and App Service plan within the same resource group and time window by the same caller. This pattern is indicative of targeted destructive activity, such as that seen in the JADEPUFFER campaign, while explicitly excluding scenarios where the entire resource group is deleted, which is typical of routine IaC teardowns.
Detects the use of built-in Windows utilities and commands to disable system recovery features, delete volume shadow copies, clear backup catalogs, or perform mass file deletion. This behavior is highly indicative of wiper malware preparing for a destructive attack by preventing system recovery.
Detects a process that has established a connection to the Telegram Bot API subsequently performing a large volume of file deletions across multiple folders within a 15-minute window. This behavior is indicative of a remote-controlled destructive attack, such as the deployment of a wiper malware (e.g., HEAVYGRAM or CHOSEN BRICK) triggered via Telegram C2 commands.
Detects the execution of the Windows cipher.exe utility with the /w flag, which is used to overwrite deleted data on a disk to prevent forensic recovery. This is a common technique used by adversaries to perform data destruction or cover their tracks.
Detects the rare 'AssumeRoot' event in AWS STS followed by high-impact administrative or destructive API calls within a one-hour window. This behavior often indicates an adversary attempting to gain elevated, privileged access to perform unauthorized actions such as disabling logging, deleting infrastructure, or modifying IAM policies.
Page 3 of 19