Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
3,868 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
2,527
525
299
218
131
Contributors
999
706
554
263
188
Categories
1,449
1,199
1,092
793
576
Platforms
39,960
7,270
6,537
3,868
3,651
Products / Services
1,757
1,449
1,121
438
406
MITRE Techniques
1,889
1,392
913
814
727
CVEs
12
5
4
3
2
IDS Classtypes
10
7
6
6
5
IDS Protocols
37
2
1
Detects impossible travel sign-in events where a user authenticates from geographically distant locations within a short time window. The rule specifically flags the second, suspicious event as having occurred via a non-interactive session or single-factor authentication, suggesting the use of a replayed or stale session token to bypass MFA.
This rule detects administrative changes that weaken cloud identity security, specifically the disabling of Entra ID Security Defaults, per-user MFA enforcement, or tenant-wide authentication-methods policies. These actions remove critical second-factor authentication requirements, significantly increasing the risk of unauthorized access via password-spraying or credential-stuffing attacks.
This rule detects instances where a user successfully activates a privileged role via Privileged Identity Management (PIM) in a cloud environment, despite the activation policy requiring approval. It flags cases where the 'Add member to role completed' event indicates that approval is required, but the 'approvalStatus' is absent, suggesting an attempt to bypass the formal approval workflow.
Detects the reactivation of a service principal by correlating the addition of new credentials followed by a successful login event for the same principal within a 7-day window. This behavior is indicative of potential persistence maintenance or account hijacking, especially when legacy or deprecated accounts are targeted.
Detects the addition of a federated identity credential to an Azure AD / Entra ID application. Adversaries may use this technique to establish persistent, secretless access to an application's service principal by configuring trust with an external OIDC issuer under their control (e.g., a malicious GitHub repository or personal OIDC provider).
Detects potential abuse of Azure Cloud Shell backing storage (acsCloudShell) to stage or persist malicious scripts following an Azure AD session compromise. Adversaries may use this storage to blend in with legitimate engineering operations while maintaining persistent access to their tooling.
Detects administrative actions in Azure that disable or modify diagnostic settings, which stops the flow of logs to services like Azure Sentinel/Log Analytics, or deletes policy assignments. Such actions are often performed by adversaries to blind security operations monitoring prior to lateral movement or further malicious activity.
Detects modifications to application secrets or certificates in Azure that are performed by a user who is not the registered owner of the application, or when a new credential is added to an application that already has credentials configured, potentially indicating persistent access establishment.
Detects the modification of an Azure Storage account configuration to enable public access (allowBlobPublicAccess: true). This activity is often associated with attackers attempting to facilitate anonymous data exfiltration by enabling public access to blobs and subsequently reading them.
Detects modifications or deletions of Azure AD Conditional Access policies that weaken security, such as disabling policies, removing MFA requirements, or adding user/group/application exclusions. This behavior can be indicative of an attacker attempting to bypass authentication controls.
This rule detects a correlation between a successful non-interactive authentication event (e.g., token-based sign-in) and a subsequent device registration event performed by the same user identity within a short time window. This sequence is a known pattern for attackers seeking to register an adversary-controlled device against a compromised account to establish durable persistence and potentially bypass conditional access policies (PRT persistence).
Detects successful authentication attempts using legacy (basic) protocols that do not enforce modern Conditional Access policies (e.g., MFA, device compliance). The rule specifically flags these events if the originating IP address or geographic location is not observed in historical sign-in activity for the specific user, which may indicate account compromise via credential theft.
Detects impossible travel sign-in events where a user authenticates from geographically distant locations within a short time window. The rule specifically flags the second, suspicious event as having occurred via a non-interactive session or single-factor authentication, suggesting the use of a replayed or stale session token to bypass MFA.
Detects successful sign-in events in Entra ID where MFA is marked as satisfied, but no interactive MFA challenge (e.g., Push, FIDO2, SMS) was recorded as completed in the authentication details. This behavior, when correlated with a new IP, device, or user-agent relative to a 30-day baseline, is highly indicative of session token replay or AitM (Adversary-in-the-Middle) attacks attempting to bypass MFA requirements.
This rule detects a multi-stage attack chain where a device shows signs of credential theft (accessing browser credential stores or cookies) followed closely by a successful cloud authentication from that same user using a device identifier not previously observed in the last 30 days.
Detects a user account adding a new client secret or certificate to an Azure AD application/service principal, followed by a sign-in event from that same service principal originating from an IP address not observed in the prior 14 days. This behavior is indicative of potential persistent access creation by an adversary using newly generated credentials.
Detects anomalous reuse of a single session identifier across geographically distinct locations and/or multiple federated SaaS applications within a short time frame. The detection specifically filters for non-interactive sign-in events, which is characteristic of session hijacking and token replay rather than standard user activity.
This rule detects Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM) role activations that occur with missing or generic justification, correlated with a sign-in session that has been flagged as risky (high/medium risk) or non-interactive. This combination suggests a potential session hijacking scenario where an adversary is attempting to elevate privileges using a compromised, legitimate user session.
This rule monitors for suspicious administrative modifications to identity federation settings within Entra ID (Azure AD) and potential unauthorized alterations to on-premises Active Directory objects related to the 'AZUREADSSOACC' account. These activities are indicative of persistence mechanisms or credential manipulation in hybrid identity environments, potentially used to subvert authentication processes.
This rule correlates a risky or compromised sign-in event in Entra ID (Azure AD) with a subsequent OAuth consent grant by the same user within 60 minutes. It specifically looks for grants that request sensitive permissions such as Mail.Read, Mail.ReadWrite, Files.ReadWrite.All, or offline_access, which are commonly associated with consent phishing and persistence tactics.
Detects non-interactive sign-in events (including refresh-token or PRT-based authentication) where the originating device is not managed by Intune/Jamf, not marked as compliant, and lacks a registered trust type. This behavior is indicative of potential stolen session token replay or unauthorized access using intercepted artifacts.
Page 30 of 185